Judiciary Subcommittee Examines Antitrust Efforts of Federal Agencies

On Dec. 12, the House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law held an oversight hearing examining federal antitrust enforcement agencies.

The hearing covered a broad range of consumer-related topics. Full Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte expressed concerns with OPEC and pharmacy benefit managers. Meanwhile, Ranking Member Jerry Nadler expressed concern that the dollar value of mergers in recent years amounted to trillions of dollars.

Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim testified on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, and Chairman Joseph J. Simons testified on behalf of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Both officials highlighted their agency’s record on antitrust cases in recent years.

Delrahim focused on criminal antitrust violations in his opening statement. In a written copy of his statement submitted before the hearing, he said, “The Division investigated and prosecuted antitrust violations across many sectors of the economy, with over $3.243 billion in criminal fines imposed in FYs 2016-17.”

Meanwhile, Simmons focused on the FTC’s record of successfully challenging mergers. In a written statement, he said, “Since the beginning of FY [fiscal year] 2017, the Commission has challenged 48 mergers. Although many of these cases were resolved through settlements, in the last year alone, the Commission sued to block five mergers, and each of these matters required a significant commitment of resources to prepare for litigation.”

The witnesses also highlighted their respective agency’s commitment to fostering competition outside of enforcement.

Simmons touted the FTC’s recent series of public hearings called “Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century.” According to him, the FTC needs to “consider whether broad-based changes in the economy, evolving business practices, new technologies, and international developments warrant adjustments to competition and consumer protection law, enforcement priorities, and policy.”

Delrahim stressed the DOJ’s initiatives to educate consumers in antitrust law. In his written statement, Delrahim said, “In addition to workshops and roundtables, the Division has also established the Jackson-Nash Addresses, a new lecture series to inspire and educate Division staff and the public about cutting-edge issues and developments in the field.”

One piece of legislation mentioned more than once was H.R. 5904, the No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act of 2018. Also called NOPEC, the bill would remove several of the legislative and regulatory barriers the DOJ faces when attempting to regulate the antitrust practices of foreign companies and corporations.

The hearing did not stick entirely to antitrust issues, touching occasionally on other aspects of consumer welfare. Incoming Ranking Member Doug Collins’s line of questions addressed technical problems consumers sometimes face when accessing illegal streaming websites. Collins mentioned malware, viruses, and privacy theft in a back-and-forth exchange with Simmons and closed by promising that consumer protection on illegal streaming websites would be a priority for him during his tenure as Ranking Member of the Judiciary Committee.

+ posts


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Subscribe to get the latest consumer news

More consumer News